Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-05-03 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-05-03 House Journal Page 4308 SB 230 The Speaker stated that, without objection, Amendment No. 2 would be addressed after Amendment No. 3. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Davies by request: Page 7, lines 7-26: Delete all material Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative James objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 230(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 6 NAYS: 29 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Navarre, Robinson Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Long, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Absent: Finkelstein, Hanley, Kubina, Ogan, Therriault And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. 1996-05-03 House Journal Page 4309 SB 230 Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Vezey: Page 7, line 20: Delete "nonmechanized" Following "mining" Insert "; the commissioner may not restrict recreational mining conducted using suction dredges provided the nozzles of the dredges are four inches or less in size" Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Brown objected. Representative Brown placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 230(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 23 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Bunde, B.Davis, G.Davis, Foster, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Long, Mackie, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Willis Nays: Austerman, Barnes, Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Kubina, Martin, Masek, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Sanders, Williams And so, Amendment No. 2 was adopted. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that HCSCSSB 230(FIN) am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. 1996-05-03 House Journal Page 4310 SB 230 Representative Navarre objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 230(FIN) am H was read the third time. The question being: Shall HCS CSSB 230(FIN) am H pass the House? The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 230(FIN) am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 33 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Nays: Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Navarre, Robinson And so, HCS CSSB 230(FIN) am H passed the House. Representative Brown gave notice of reconsideration of her vote on HCS CSSB 230(FIN) am H.